THE GE SCORE SHEET
Our score sheets have been added to the END of the entry. Each entry has ONE file per
judge.
ENTRY
NUMBER: CS #___ JUDGE
NUMBER: JCS # 21 SCORE: ________ / 100
MANUSCRIPT
TITLE: EVER AFTER
APPEARS
ONLY ON Category Series Score Sheets
TARGETED Publisher
or Series: _______
---The entry form allows the contestant to
name a publisher or specific series. If they provided the information, it will
be provided here.
APPEARS
ONLY ON FF&P Score Sheets
SELECT ONE: Alternate Earth, Dystopian,
Fantasy, Futuristic, Time Travel, Paranormal
or _____
--- The entry form allows the contestant to designate
what sub-genre they are targeting. If the information was provided, only one of
the above will be in red or highlighted yellow.
The top portion of
the score sheet will be completed by the coordinator with the exception of the
score which should be completed by the judge. You will notice that the Entry #,
the manuscript title, and the Judge # are what make up the file name:
CS03-EverAfter-JCS21.rtf
PLEASE DO NOT CHANGE THE FILE NAMES.
PLEASE DO NOT CHANGE THE FILE NAMES.
PLEASE DO NOT CHANGE THE FILE NAMES.
PLEASE DO NOT CHANGE THE FILE NAMES.
PLEASE DO NOT CHANGE THE FILE NAMES.
The Contemporary
Series MAY or MAY NOT have a particular targeted line. This information is
provided to help guide comments, but is NOT required. The SPECIALIZED category
may have a specific sub-genre listed to help guide your comments, but this
information was NOT required.
Formatting may have shifted in file transfer. DO NOT
deduct for formatting.
The Great
Expectations contest does not deduct for formatting. Each manuscript was
verified prior to being sent to judges.
Scoring:
5 --
Outstanding, suitable for submission
4 -- Very
Good, needs some tweaking 2 -- Has
potential, needs work
3 --
Good, problem areas noted 1
-- Needs major revision
SCORING
Please keep the
following in mind:
Keep scores pure. Marking off for pacing problems on both the pacing
question and plot question is a double whammy. If an entry has a grammar issue
(for instance, using a semi-colon consistently, but improperly) throughout, do
not continue to deduct points for one mistake.
USING ALL THE
SCORES:
Feel free to use the full range of the possible scores: 1 through 5.
Feel free to use the full range of the possible scores: 1 through 5.
5 -- Outstanding,
suitable for submission
The manuscript does not have to be perfect
to receive a 5.
Even well-rounded authors love to hear what they did correctly.
Even well-rounded authors love to hear what they did correctly.
4 -- Very Good,
needs some tweaking
A section of the manuscript needs
fine-tuning.
3 -- Good, problem
areas noted
More than one section or problem needs
revisions.
2 -- Has potential,
needs work
Please give constructive comments and
examples.
1 -- Needs major
revision
Please give constructive comments and
examples.
As in every contest with judges, when giving a score of one, two or
three, please try to point out specific areas on the manuscript you are
referring to. And also how the author may improve these areas in regards to
this specific manuscript or overall in their writing. AND be nice, not harsh.
Don’t leave the
contestant wondering why.
As
in every contest, when giving a score of one, two or three, please try to point
out specific areas on the manuscript you are referring to. And also how the
author may improve these areas in regards to this specific manuscript or
overall in their writing.
Harsh is different than
critical. Whether a beginning writer or a very seasoned one, contestants
entered the Great Expectations for your opinion of their writing, but expect a
professional view. Don’t leave the contestant wondering
why you were critical.
If you don’t have any resources for tips, check out the Writing Tips in our judge training material, RWA®’s webpage, the webpages of your favorite author or contact the coordinator.
Still
need help? Send the coordinator an email. As always, if you have questions
relating specifically to an entry, contact the category coordinator or
GEcoordinator@ntrwa.org.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Most of the opinions on judging and interpreting the questions’ intent are my own words. I’ve been in the business over 15 years and have spoken to many authors, gathering information. A lot of the time when a question is asked, I go to authors who publish in that genre for advice. Please use your own expertise and experience, but keep our humble interpretations in mind.
~Thanks, Angi Morgan
Contributions and edits by Fenley Grant.
Additional help tips for judging all entries are available through our judge training on the blog.
No comments:
Post a Comment