THE SCORE SHEET
~ ALL SPECIFIC SECTIONS
~Some of the
explanations are the same for general questions which require some expected
knowledge of the sub-genre. If you require a more in-depth definition of the
genre...please send an email for additional information. Additional resources
are being posted this week.
~For your
convenience we’ve included a description of each category as described on our FINAL EDITORS page.
*MAINSTREAM WITH ROMANTIC ELEMENTS*
Novels that include an element of romance but in which traditional
romance conventions are not followed and in which there are themes and
conflicts beyond romance. Mainly women’s fiction and chick lit. An example
is the 2017 RWA RITA winner: The Moon in the Palace by Weina Dai
Randel
Please note that the Mainstream with
Romantic Elements category may hint at the possibility of romance. Please do
not judge the entry based on the romance, MRE normally focuses on one
protagonist’s journey.
SPECIFIC TO THE MAINSTREAM w/ROMANTIC ELEMENTS CATEGORY
Possible 20 point total to award, 5 points per question
MAINSTREAM w/ROMANTIC
ELEMENTS CATEGORY
|
|
Does the story focus
on one protagonist and/or their journey?
|
|
Is there an element
to the story that takes it beyond a traditional single title romance?
|
|
Does the author build
a sustainable story beyond using the traditional romantic elements?
(The story should set the groundwork for a potential romantic relationship
but should not be the central focus of the story.)
|
|
Are
the
secondary characters necessary, interesting, and believable?
|
|
Comments:
|
Breaking Down the Questions
Does the story focus on one
protagonist and/or their journey?
Mainstream or women’s fiction. One
protagonist on a journey…normally that is not a journey to find love (although
that subject isn’t ruled out as long as the main focus is on the one
protagonist). Emotional reflection and action that is a journey of
self-discovery. Here’s an article by a women’s fiction
author on what to expect.
Is there an element to the story
that takes it beyond a traditional single title romance?
Wow…now that’s a serious question, right?
Beyond a traditional single title…reference back to a journey of
self-discovery. It may or may not involve a hero (traditional single title
romance must have a hero). It is normally a protagonist over thirty. AND the
protagonist saves herself through her self-discovery.
Does the author build a sustainable
story beyond using the traditional romantic elements? (The
story should set the groundwork for a potential romantic relationship but
should not be the central focus of the story.)
With many MRE entries, one of the two protagonists may not be
introduced in the first 5000 words. Each contestant had the opportunity to view
the score sheet before entering the contest. Please use your judgment as best
as you can.
Are the secondary characters
necessary, interesting, and believable?
As with any length and any sub-genre of
romance, the secondary characters must have a purpose in the scene. A second
character in the room is the perfect way to give the reader information without
the POV character just thinking about it. Dialogue is always better (in my
humble opinion). But be careful the character doesn’t begin an info-dump. If
this seems the case, will this suggestion help? Example: the author may try a
mental note that the secondary character is talking a lot or have the
discussion with the secondary character. In other words, draw all the
characters into the scene and make it necessary to forward the plot.
If you have specific questions regarding this section, please
contact GEcoordinator@ntrwa.org.
Additional help tips for this category may be available through
the coordinator or on our blog.
~ ~ ~
Most of the opinions on judging and interpreting the questions’
intent are my own words. I’ve been in the business over 15 years and have
spoken to many authors, gathering information. A lot of the time when a
question is asked, I go to authors who publish in that genre for advice. Please
use your own expertise and experience, but keep our humble interpretations in
mind.
~Thanks, Angi Morgan
Contributions and edits by Fenley Grant.
Additional help tips for judging all entries
are available through our judge
training on the blog.
No comments:
Post a Comment